A Jury of One: Opinion Formation, Conformity, and Dissent on Juries
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Group Decision-Making: An Economic Analysis of Social Influence and Individual Difference in Experimental Juries
In a jury decision-making, individuals must compromise in order to reach a group consensus. If individuals compromise for non-rational reasons, such as a preference for conformity or due to erroneous information, then the final decision of the group may be biased. This paper presents original experimental data which shows that groups do have a significant tendency to compromise in jury-like set...
متن کاملEvaluating the use of citizens’ juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation
BACKGROUND Deliberative engagement techniques and citizens' juries are touted as means of incorporating the public into policy decision-making, managing community expectations and increasing commitment to public health policy. This paper reports a study to examine the feasibility of citizens' juries as a means of collecting data to inform public health policy related to food regulation through ...
متن کاملJury Decision-Making: Normative and Informational Influences
Juries are distinct groups in which scholars have been investigating for decades past. Members of these groupscalled jurorsare key players in the court process and are susceptible to psychological concepts such as social conformity. With previous studies showing that jurors can be affected by both normative and informational influences, this calls into question the idea of being influenced thro...
متن کاملDecline of the “little Parliament”: Juries and Jury Reform in England and Wales
INTRODUCTION The English jury evokes passionate and often extreme views. On the one hand, trial by jury is vigorously defended as an ancient right, a bastion of liberty, and a means whereby the ordinary person’s common sense views can inform decisions and contain the powers of government. On the other hand, the jury is regarded much more cynically as a costly, sometimes incompetent anachronism ...
متن کاملThe nature of the beast: are citizens’ juries deliberative or pluralist?
Citizens’ juries are a form of ‘‘minipublics,’’ small-scale experiments with citizen participation in public decision-making. The article presents a theoretical argument that improves understanding relating to the design of the citizens’ jury. We develop the claim that two discourses on democracy can be discerned: the deliberative and the pluralist. By looking at the design features of citizens...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008